Jul
26
2009
0

AT&T Blocks Access to img.4chan.org

FUCK AT&T.

AT&T IS EVIL

AT&T IS EVIL

Quoted from Reddit:

From what I can tell, this is only a confirmed issue in Southern California at the moment, but seems to be wider than just a regional problem. Those who have contacted AT&T representatives were told that the site is in fact blocked, so this isn’t a technical problem, and all the other 4chan subdomains work fine.

Moot is aware

It’s come to our attention that AT&T is filtering/blocking img.4chan.org (/b/ & /r9k/) for many of their customers. There is no remedy at this time.

If you’ve been affected, I would advise you call or write customer support and corporate immediately.

xkcd’s comment is my favorite:

What IP blocks do their corporate offices have? If they’re really cutting off my trashy time-wasting web entertainment, I’m cutting off theirs.

As many people have been saying, this very well could be the begeniniung of the end of the Internet as we know it. And considering the 4chan crowd, AT&T should be ready to battle. The shit is really going to hit the fan now. Too bad for AT&T. HA.


I created these graphics. Please feel free to use them for yourself.

Creative Commons License

Written by nickganga in: Anonymous, Internet, at&t, censorship, technology |
Jul
20
2009
1

Blackberry Certificate Issues

Has anyone been having trouble with their Blackberry devices? I’ve been getting these messages for the past few days. I’m on AT&T using a Bold 9000.

Apr
16
2009
0

RFID Binge

I’m working on a research project involving Context-Aware RFID Driven Web Applications and came across these videos.


iPhone RFID: object-based media from timo on Vimeo.


Wireless in the world from timo on Vimeo.


Making an RFID cross-section from timo on Vimeo.


Experiments in Field Drawing from timo on Vimeo.

These are just for fun :)


Volume I from timo on Vimeo.


Volume III from timo on Vimeo.

Mar
13
2009
10

Internet Explorer 7 Advanced Proxy Settings via Group Policy

Something that has been on my task list for the last 4 months, and pissing me off royally the entire time, has been to figure out why Group Policy settings for Proxy Settings have not been applying to Internet Explorer 7 clients. The policy has worked fine in Internet Explorer 6 but after upgrading to Internet Explorer 7, the function ceased to work. Apparently, this has been an issue for a lot of users: SOLUTION!
While some users had luck after checking Proxy Exceptions to make sure no invalid characters were included, many were still faced with the initial problem. After months of looking for a solution to this problem, the big M$ decided to FINALLY address the issue with a knowledge base article (which was only posted THIS WEEK on March 10, 2009). According to Microsoft, the issue is related to Internet Explorer 7 no longer supporting the Gopher protocol. As a result, if you customize a GPO to include Internet Explorer Proxy Settings, you MUST NOT INCLUDE GOPHER. Simply leave the field blank, close the GPO and refresh the settings on the client computer. Like MAGIC the settings now appear! Woohoo. Check below for a short guide.

Guide:
  1. Open the Group Policy Management Console and navigate to the GPO holding the settings.
  2. Navigate to the Proxy Configuration Settings located at User Configuration/Windows Settings/Internet Explorer Maintenance/Connection and configure the Proxy Settings field.
    Group Policy Configuration
  3. In this example, every field is set to the same server and port. Do not use the option "Use the same proxy server for all addresses."
    Original Proxy Settings
  4. Simply delete the entries on the Gopher Field, click Apply and then Ok.
    Adjusted Proxy Settings
  5. From the Client machine, open a command prompt and run "gpupdate /force".
    gpupdate
  6. Check your IE settings. The proxy configuration should now be applied!

Let me know if this works for you!

Feb
12
2009
4

Comcast 16MB/s Service

I have to say, I’m pretty impressed. I just upgraded my Comcast internet service from the 8 Meg service to the 16Meg and went from 16033 kbps (2004.1 KB/sec transfer rate) to 21448 kbps (2681 KB/sec transfer rate). Both tests were run against Chicago. Not too shabby! 8 Meg service 16 Meg Service
Written by nickganga in: Internet, technology | Tags: , ,
Jan
20
2009
0

Thanks Special

To Frank Potter @ Loopt for helping make this geo-tagging experience possible!

Jan
18
2009
0

How To: Create Blackberry Ringtones with GarageBand

I’ve put together a short video (~ 6min) about how to create ringtones for a Blackberry using GarageBand on your mac. Soon to come are Quicktime Pro & iPhone variants.

[display_podcast]

YouTube Version

Jan
14
2009
0

WordPress for iPhone

I’m using the iPhone/iPod touch WordPress client. Not too shabby if you ask me!

Written by nickganga in: Internet, Software, apple, technology | Tags: , ,
Jan
11
2009
0

User Interface Examples Posted!

I have gone ahead and posted all of the Adobe Flex 3 projects I worked on during the Fall 2008 semester at Oakland University. The course focused on Human Computer Interaction and User Interface. Check out the demos!

Moodle Redesign
Dec
29
2008
1

AT&T Outage, The Aftermath

Well now that AT&T services have been successfully restored, its comforting to find that the source of a massive service outage, covering approximately 5 states worth of subscribers, can be traced back to a single power failure in my hometown of Bloomfield, MI. How exciting. For the record, a majority of residents in Bloomfield & the surrounding areas are still without power. Bloomfield, MI
Written by nickganga in: 3g, Internet, Uncategorized, at&t |
Dec
28
2008
0

AT&T = FAIL

WTF MATE

Written by nickganga in: 3g, General, Internet, at&t, technology |
Oct
01
2008
0

tikitag unboxing

The Tikitag first kit has arrived! Check out the unboxing pictures below! The box and packaging is very minimal and the tags are very, very small.

The tag is about the width of a small paperclip.


Had to take it apart :)

Smartcard?

Smart card out of slot

Written by nickganga in: Internet, Software, technology | Tags: , , ,
May
25
2008
0

Web Host or Web Ghost?

Once upon a time, many a year ago, the internet was born. And with that came the need for web hosting companies (web-hosts). Soon the land was filled with hosts, some dedicated and others just resellers of the more expensive services.
On a nice Winter day in 2001, I purchased my very first domain name for ten years! Not being familiar with how the domain names and hosting worked, it took me about a week to figure out that I needed to pay for hosting in addition to buying the domain name. This is where my web hosting adventure begins.

While I can’t remember the name of my first webhost, I do recall they were limited to static HTML pages with no included database technologies and cost me about $5/month. At the time, that was a lot of money to me. That web host worked out very well for me, considering my site was statically generated using Microsoft Frontpage 2000. Unfortunately, that web-host went out of business and decided to transfer all their customers to their "parent". I use the term parent loosely because they were really just the wholesale distributor of hosting service. It was this experience that opened my eyes to some of the real workings web-hosting online. Any Joe Schmo can buy hosting in bulk from a larger company and resell it in smaller packs. Not a bad idea on paper, but obviously not the best for the customer either. This was the end of my experience with my first hosting company.

As I went back to the tubes to try and find another host company, I found it hard to gauge wether or not a web-host had their own servers or was just reselling for another company. Since the prices for dedicated hosting were astronomical compared to that of shared/resold hosting, I decided to narrow my search down to something within my price range. After doing a bit of research, I decided on a company called based Reyox, out of Seattle, Washington. At $9.95/month I thought it was a pretty fair deal. At the time, I selected Windows hosting (not really knowing anything different) and I continued to use Frontpage to build static sites. It wasn’t until I started to build more dynamic sites that I became frustrated with Reyox. At one point all of the Reyox sites got hacked my some hackers in Hungary. My entire site was destroyed along with some of my friend’s sites that I had recommended to Reyox. During my time with Reyox, I always thought it was interesting that when I contacted the support people, I would always be dealing with the same person, Asher Saeed. It wasn’t until after I left Reyox that I realized he owned Reyox and was the only person running the show.

My next stop in the web-hosting world was a company called MediaTemple. I was referred to them by a friend who had raved about their exceptional service, customer service and automated tools. At $20 a month, MediaTemple was more expensive compared to Reyox, but I needed a reliable host with no BS. During my first year of service with MediaTemple, I was relatively happy with their service. They offer all the services you would expect from any Linux provider: PHP, Apache, MySQL, ssh acces, etc. It wasn’t until after my first year that I really started to experience problems. The problems started with the MySQL and PHP simply flaking out at any time up for up to 10 minutes at a time. When I first contacted the support team at (mt), they told me it was because there was a heavy load on my sites. At first I just accepted their explanation, but when it started to happen on a daily basis, and especially when I was working on web projects for my classes I couldn’t stand it anymore. As you can see from the MediaTemple , the issues were originally documented by (mt) at the end of February and continued all the way through May 14, 2008. If you ask me, that is unacceptable for any host. I was giving a presentation for one of my academic projects and the web app completely crapped out. It was right then that I decided Media Temple had to go.

I’m now on a new host. One that is owned called Mosso. They pride themselves on offering both Apache/IIS 7 and everything you would expect from both of those. At $100 a month, it is the most expensive host I have ever used, but it definitely has paid off. I have been on them for 3 months now and from a service standpoint, I have been really happy with the performance of the sites, databases and server side scripting processing. In my opinions, the only thing missing in Mosso is SSH shell access, but I hear it’s on the way. Mosso also has one of the best Reseller interfaces available from any host I’ve used, especially for web developers who handle everything for their customers.

Overall, I’ve been very happy with Mosso and I would recommend their service to anyone looking for excellent web hosting. I know the price is a bit steep, so if anyone is interested just post a comment and we can work something out with the reseller interface.


May
25
2008
0

MediaTemple Complaint

This is the complaint I sent to MediaTemple about their lack of service:

 


 

Attn: Media Temple Customer Service

     Starting late in Q4 of 2007 and all through Q1 of 2008, I have experienced a number of difficulties with Media Temple’s (gs) service. First, I have had a great deal of sporadic and domain wide downtime. At any given time, all services (Web, FTP, SSH, MySQL, etc) all become unavailable for up to 8 minutes. I have been relying on Media Temple to deliver excellent service but there has been a real lack of that in the last 6 months. At first I thought the issue was somehow only related to my hosting service but after reviewing the Media Temple Support Forums and other online forums I found many other users who were experiencing similar issues. The was the response to my most recent communication with support (Support ID#355346):
Support response: 2008/03/18 10:53
We are aware that at times you have been seeing slow response, and at times, no response at all from your server. We are continuing to work on our system that dynamically isolates and allocates server resources among our (gs)Grid Service customers. This system is intended to keep your site running smoothly even when other customers have surges in their traffic causing an unusual server load. This works both ways. If you have a surge in traffic, we want to make sure your pages continue to be served without delays or slowness. 

If the capabilities of the SmartPool v.2 shared MySQL server are not adequate for your site, you can purchase a MySQL Container to have your own dedicated MySQL server. You can do this in the Account Center, by rolling over the Domains tab, clicking on your primary domain, then clicking on Manage Databases. From that page, click on the MySQL Container tab on the right of the page, then click Enable Container. Once the Container is enabled, you can use the Query Analyzer and MySQL report on the Container tab as well as phpMyAdmin to get some performance information. The Repair Tables link on this page can also help improve performance by recreating indexes for all of your databases.

We appreciate your feedback and comments as we work to improve this system.

Best Regards,

Sean O’Brien
Customer Support
(mt) Media Temple
<v> 877-578-4000
<f> 310-564-2007

In a later conversation with the support team, I was directed to this page: http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/category/system-incidents/gs-grid-service-cluster1-service-availability/ to keep track of the availability of the system. Notice this particular blog entry was opened in late February and lasted nearly a month in the system, only to be marked resolved and link to another issue that is still open. I use websites to present projects for classes and other academic projects and during 3 of the last 5 presentations I have given, the site has gone down during the presentation and embarrassed me, my team mates and our faculty sponsors. Even at this moment I am not able to access phpMyAdmin to administer my MySQL databases.
      Second is the lack of a backup feature. One of the reasons I signed up with media temple was the to automate the backup process for my sites. This feature has been "Unavailable" on the control panel for more than 4 months now. The following message has been posted on the site since the feature was taken offline:
Our backup component is unavailable at this time. We are currently developing a new "Data Backups" tool which will offer all the functionality we had previously, plus some new features. We have received a lot of feedback from our customers and cannot wait to show you what we have in store. We plan on launching the new tool in the Q1 2008. We understand that backups are critical to any hosting service and we look forward to providing you with a stellar solution that will ensure trouble-free backups.
I contacted support (Support ID#  319596) on January 4, 2008 to find out the status of the backup feature and was told a new backup feature would be coming in the next few months. As I’m sure you know, we are now in Q2 of 2008 and after checking the page just now I see the feature is still unavailable. As you state, "…backups are critical to any hosting service…" and yet there is no backup feature. 
      Finally, I am a bit unhappy with the domain renewal service offered by Media Temple. Regarding Support ID 323602, you can see that I requested one of my domains not be renewed. After talking to the support rep, I discovered that the renewal had already been processed, even though the domain had not expired. I found the reminder/notification of expiration email that was automatically sent out to be vague, confusing and inaccurate. The email should indicate that MT will automatically start processing the renewal and state the deadline to cancel the renewal. 
  For these reasons I would like to request to cancel my service with Media Temple and request a refund for the annual Grid Service that was renewed on January 16, 2008. 
Written by nickganga in: Internet, hosting, technology | Tags: , , , ,


copyright 2008 nickganga.com © | all rights reserved